Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

THE STRANGE TRIAL OF THE GOOD LOOKING POPE


Published in the U Matuna, the newspaper for the Catholic Archdiocese of Hagatna, Guam on 3/17/13

By the time you read this we will probably have a new pope. I haven’t been paying much attention to the pre-conclave conversations, not even the twitters from tweeting cardinals. It’s not that I don’t care, it’s just that the magnitude of the event reduces anything that can be said about it to the mere political chatter.


It’s the sort of thing (I think) that calls for much fear and trembling. And, of course there is much to tremble about. While we can be assured that Pope Benedict’s resignation was divinely motivated, we can also be sure that Benedict was quite aware that “something wicked this way comes”, and that he knew he could best engage the beast, not from the Chair of Peter, but from the contemplative confines of a cloister.


We pray his successor will be up the task. But he may not be. Fortunately for us, during recent centuries, our church has been guided by mostly good and holy men who were also able leaders. However, in the long history of the church, several successors to the Holy See were less than able men who sometimes served more as a test to Christ’s promise that “the gates of hell will not prevail” than they did as Holy Fathers.


In the wake of “the butler did it” fiasco and the continuing saga of clergy sex-abuse, Benedict’s sudden resignation has left some of us feeling unstable and even a bit fearful. However, in this moment of uncertainty we would do well to recall how our church has fared through far more unstable and frightening times.

One such time was what has been called the “iron age of the papacy”, the period between 872 and 965, when the papacy had fallen into the possession of powerful Roman families. As historian Eamon Duffy records in SAINTS AND SINNERS:  the papacy, having “fallen into the snakepit of Italian politics...became a ticket to local dominance for which men were prepared to rape, murder, and steal.

During this 94 year period, there were no less than 24 popes - and during one nine year stretch (896-904) there were nine popes. Duffy records that during this period, seven of the 24 popes were assassinated or died under suspicious circumstances: 

• John VIII was bludgeoned to death by his own entourage, 
• Stephen VI strangled, 
• Leo V murdered by his successor Sergius III, 
• John X suffocated, 
• Stephen VIII horribly mutilated - having had his eyes gouged out and ears, nose, and hands cut off - died of his injuries, 
• Hadrian III poisoned, 
• and John XII beaten to death.

In his book TRIUMPH, author Harry Crocker calls the period “the medieval equivalent of a Mafia gang war between powerful families contesting for the throne.” But the uncontested low point of this low point for the papacy was the macabre trial of a dead pope by another pope known as the Cadaver Synod or, in Latin, as the “synod horrenda”.

In 897, Pope Stephen VI (or VII - the accounts vary) had the body of his immediate predecessor, Pope Formosus - who had been dead for seven months - disinterred, robed in pontifical vestments, propped up on the papal throne, and tried for perjury, coveting the papacy, and violating church canons when he was elected pope.

Stephen allegedly acted as judge, jury and chief prosecutor, and during the trial “screamed and raved and hurled insults at the rotting corpse.” Finding Pope Formosus guilty on all counts, the hysterical Stephen ordered the dead pope’s three fingers on his right hand cut off, the corpse stripped of its vestments and thrown into a common grave.

But that wasn’t the end of it. Formosus was again dug up by Stephen’s allies and his corpse thrown into the Tiber where it later washed ashore and was discovered by a monk. Formosus, whose name means “good looking”, had been a popular pope, and once it was discovered what Stephen had done, the people mobbed the papal palace and imprisoned Stephen where he was later strangled.

But we’re still not done. Two succeeding popes, Theodore II, whose reign only lasted twenty days, and John IX, both held synods nullifying the cadaver synod, and ordered Formosus’ body to be reinterred with papal dignity.

However, two popes later, Sergius III, who had ordered the murder of his predecessor John X, and who also hated Formosus, reversed the decisions of Theodore II and John IX, re-condemned Formosus, and had a laudatory epitaph inscribed onto the tomb of the mad pope, Stephen.

Apparently Sergius never got around to disinterring Formosus’ body a third time since his name is found in St. Peter’s Basilica on an engraved list of popes who are buried there. It’s just a guess, but I’m betting our new pope’s name will not be Formosus II.









Saturday, August 19, 2006

History Quiz

Every Friday I receive an email newsletter from CT at the Movies. CT stands for Christianity Today and I enjoy their movie reviews as well as appreciate their fair and open treatment of all Christian religions.

However, every once in awhile I am amused by a very obvious, albeit probably unconscious, anti-Catholic slip. I say “amused” because, the slip bespeaks an anti-Catholic understanding of history that is so inbred in most protestant Americans that they haven’t even the foggiest clue that their comments have all the grace and tact of the proverbial bull in the china closet; assuming of course that the Catholic reader actually knows something of history other than what he got from the Discovery Channel or the Da Vinci Code

Sadly, or perhaps, mercifully, most Catholics, since they’ve been spared the task of learning any real history for the last two generations, will never know the attack that was just leveled against their Faith, and will go on their merry way whistling “all is well, all is well”.

The “slip” in question is the following statement taken from the CT at the Movies email newsletter of 8/18/06:

World Trade Center illustrates how people can respond when under attack— when
their fellow human beings, under the veil of terrorism disguised as religious ideology, turn into mass murderers.

Variations on this theme have certainly happened before, many times in the course of human history—the Crusades, the Holocaust, and the Rwandan genocide being just a few examples.

The context of course is a review of the recent release of the movie “World Trade Center”. Now, Catholics, here’s your history test. Can you spot the problem, the error, the gross error, the hostile anti-Catholic bigotry, the… Okay, I’ll stop. It’s actually not that bad simply because it was unintended (or at least I think so). But it’s still an error, an error which first bespeaks the aforementioned inbred anti-Catholic understanding of history in this country, but second, an error that has the potential to undermine the faith of unaware, but otherwise sincere Catholics.

The more I looked at “it”, the more “bothered” I became and decided to get the attention of the writers by sending a nice message with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. However, the last paragraph mentioned the name Steven D. Greydanus. Steven is an Catholic movie critic and publishes his excellent reviews on Decent Films and in the National Catholic Register. His name was mentioned because CT was welcoming him as a new contributor.

In the spirit of God sparing Sodom at the insistence of Abraham (which of course He eventually didn’t do), I mercifully chose to spare CT the “unsubscribe” notice on account of their addition of Greydanus. However, I wasn’t about to overlook CT’s grievous transgression but decided to complain via Greydanus as per my following email which will also provide the answer to the above history quiz…which by now you should have answered.

Hi Steven,
I almost unsubscribed to CT at the Movies just now, but then saw your name in the last paragraph of the email...so I decided to stay on and voice my concern to you. Though I normally like everything they write I took strong exception to their throwing the Crusades into the same category as the Holocaust and Rwanda. (typical protestant mistake). There were bad men and bad things associated with the Crusades, but the original cause was noble, or at least thought to be. It was the Pope who called for the crusades. To allow for the conection that CT is trying to make is to equate the Pope with Hitler. Just my opinion. Hopefully you'll be able to help these guys.
Thanks for all you do.
Tim Rohr


I have very up close and personal experience with certain persons’ Catholic Faith shaken and sometimes shattered by this type of anti-Catholic historical revisionism. The three favorite topics in this genre are the Avignon Papacy, the Crusades, and of course the Inquisition.

By the way, I do not blame those whose faith was “shaken” or “shattered”. I will not just write them off with a casual “Well their faith was weak”. Where would a Catholic learn of these things, and even more important, learn the truth about these events in order to combat the constant harangue of both the secular media and anti-Catholic propagandists?

Alas, we shall leave that discussion for another day. Meanwhile, may I recommend “Triumph – The Power and the Glory of the Catholic Church” by Harry Crocker III. This is an excellent and very readable history, a history we should know.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...